Frota, P.O. et al. American Journal of Infection Control. Published online: 24 August 2016
- The interventions immediately improved the effectiveness of cleaning.
- These improvements disappeared after four months of interventions.
- Microfiber cloths did not impact any increase in cleaning effectiveness.
- Continuous education and feedback on cleaning practices appear to be warranted.
- This policy should be adapted to the particularities of each health care setting.
Background: Cleaning of surfaces is essential in reducing environmental bioburdens and health care-associated infection in emergency units. However, there are few or no studies investigating cleaning surfaces in these scenarios. Our goal was to determine the influence of a multifaceted intervention on the effectiveness of routine cleaning of surfaces in a walk-in emergency care unit.
Methods: This prospective, before-and-after interventional study was conducted in 4 phases: phase I (situational diagnosis), phase II (implementation of interventions—feedback on results, standardization of cleaning procedures, and training of nursing staff), phase III (determination of the immediate influence of interventions), and phase IV (determination of the late influence of interventions). The surfaces were sampled before and after cleaning by visual inspection, adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay, and microbiologic culture.
Results: We sampled 240 surfaces from 4 rooms. When evaluated by visual inspection and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence, there was a progressive reduction of surfaces found to be inadequate in phases I-IV (P < .001), as well as in culture phases I-III. However, phase IV showed higher percentages of failure by culture than phase I (P = .004).
Conclusions: The interventions improved the effectiveness of cleaning. However, this effect was not maintained after 2 months.
Read the abstract here